芸能界クレーンゲーム王決定戦 酒井 敏也がまさかの・・・【裏芸能ブチギレ】
The study offers some preliminary evidence to support this idea.
Whereas the present study focuses primarily on documenting brain changes during pregnancy, she expects follow-up work to tackle more applied questions such as how brain changes relate to postpartum depression or attachment difficulties between mother and are ゲームキス結婚キル like />A study published Monday in Nature Neuroscience reveals that during pregnancy women undergo significant brain remodeling that persists for at least two years after birth.
The study also offers preliminary evidence that this remodeling may play a role in helping women transition into motherhood.
A research team at Autonomous University of Barcelona, led by neuroscientist Elseline Hoekzema of Leiden University, performed brain scans on first-time mothers before and after pregnancy and found significant gray matter changes in brain regions associated with social cognition and theory of mind—the same regions that were activated when women looked ゲーム王ケノ当選番号 photos of their infants.
There is only one other time when our bodies produce similarly large quantities of these hormones: puberty.
Previous research has shown that during puberty these hormones cause dramatic structural and organizational changes in the brain.
Very little research has focused on anatomical brain changes during pregnancy, however.
The 25 women who got pregnant were rescanned soon after they gave birth; 11 of them were scanned two years after that.
For comparison, the researchers also scanned check this out and women who were not trying to have a child as well as first-time fathers.
The scientists used a standard scale to rate the attachment between mother and infant.
The researchers found that the new mothers experienced gray matter reductions that lasted for at least two years after birth.
These brain changes could also be used to predict how mothers scored on the attachment scale.
In fact, researchers were able to use a computer algorithm to identify which women were new mothers based solely on their patterns of gray matter loss.
Gray matter loss was not seen in new fathers or nonparents.
Among the 50 scientists in attendance was the preeminent physicist Edward Teller.
After hearing from scientists at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Naval Research Laboratory who had observed isotopic shifts in room-temperature experiments, Teller concluded that nuclear effects were taking place.
He even had a hunch about a possible mechanism, involving some sort of charge-neutral particle.
By October, tritium production and low-levels of neutrons in such experiments had been reported from a few reputable laboratories, including Los Alamos National Laboratory and the Bhabha Atomic Research Center in India.
Moreover, BARC researchers observed that the tritium production and neutron emissions were temporally correlated.
Outside reviewers selected by the Department wwwグーグルゲームのダウンロード Energy and tasked with examining the worldwide claims included this data in a draft of their report.
Before the document was finalized, however, they removed the tables containing that data.
By the mid-1990s, a vocal contingent of scientists attempting to confirm Fleischmann and Pons' claims promoted the room-temperature fusion idea.
Other scientists in the field, however, observed evidence—isotopic shifts and heavy-element transmutations—that pointed not to fusion but to some sort of neutron-induced reaction.
Larsen suspected that a neutronization process was occurring in low-energy nuclear reactions LENR.
Physicist Allan Widom joined Larsen's team in 2004, and in 2006 they published a theory in the European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields.
The theory explains how nuclear reactions can occur at or near room temperature through the creation of ultra-low-momentum neutrons and subsequent neutron-capture processes.
Such neutrons, according to the theory, have a very large DeBroglie wavelength and therefore have a huge capture cross-section, explaining why so few neutrons are detected.
Many-body collective quantum and electromagnetic effects are fundamental to Widom and Larsen's explanation for the energy required to create neutrons in LENR cells.
Crucially, such reaction-rate calculations are based not on few-body interactions but on many-body interactions.
A few of these fusion believers began making unsupported claims of commercially viable energy technologies.
Hidden in the confusion are many scientific reports, some of them published in respectable peer-reviewed journals, showing a wide variety of experimental evidence, including transmutations of elements.
Reports also show that LENRs can produce local surface temperatures of 4,000-5,000 K and boil metals palladium, nickel and tungsten in small numbers of scattered microscopic sites on the surfaces of laboratory devices.
Heavy shielding has not been necessary.
The Widom-Larsen theory offers a plausible explanation—localized conversion of gamma radiation to infrared radiation.
The https://casino-win-deposit.site/5/8497.html is that immense technological opportunities may exist if a practical source of energy can be developed from these laboratory curiosities.
Perhaps most surprising is that, in the formative years of atomic science in the early 20th century, some scientists reported inexplicable experimental evidence of elemental transmutations.
In the 1910s and 1920s, this research was reported in popular newspapers and magazines, and papers were published in the top scientific journals of the day, including Physical Review, Science and Nature.
The experiments, using relatively simple, low-energy benchtop apparatus, did not use radioactive sources so the results defied prevailing theory.
Several https://casino-win-deposit.site/5/8448.html independently detected the production of the gases helium-4, neon, argon, and an as-yet-unidentified element of mass-3, which we now identify as tritium.
Two of these researchers were Nobel laureates.
Ravnitzky on December 7, 2016 A surprising opportunity to explore something new in chemistry and physics has emerged.
In March 1989, electrochemists Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, at the University of Utah, announced that they had "established a sustained nuclear fusion reaction" at room temperature.
By nearly all accounts, the event was a fiasco.
The fundamental reason was that the products of their experiments looked nothing like deuterium-deuterium D+D fusion.
In the following weeks, Caltech chemist Nathan Lewis sharply criticized Fleischmann and Pons in a symposium, a press release, a one-man press conference at the American Physical Society meeting in Baltimore, Maryland, and during his oral presentation ゲーム王ケノ当選番号 the APS meeting.
Despite Lewis' prominence in the media spotlight, he never published a peer-reviewed critique of the peer-reviewed Fleischmann-Pons papers, and for good reason.
Lewis' critique of the Fleischmann-Pons experiment was based on wrong guesses and assumptions.
Richard Petrasso, a physicist at MIT, took Fleischmann and Pons to task for their claimed gamma-ray peak.
Petrasso and the MIT team, after accusing Fleischmann and Pons of fraud in the Boston Herald, later published a sound and well-deserved peer-reviewed critique of what had become multiple versions of the claimed peak.
Data show that changes to atomic nuclei, including observed shifts in the abundance of isotopes, can occur without high-energy accelerators or nuclear reactors.
For a century, this has been considered impossible.
In hindsight, glimpses of the new phenomena were visible 27 years ago.
There are certain aspects of mortality that are predictable and preventable, and certain aspects that are essentially random and unpredictable.
The flu can impact other causes of death, and it can cause people with existing chronic conditions to die from those conditions.
So someone with heart disease who gets the flu, that flu can precipitate a heart attack or exacerbate existing chronic lung disease or many other things.
For people who are very ill and may be hanging on, they can die sooner than they may have otherwise.
We will be getting more into that soon.
We have data on accidental poisonings overall—and the overwhelming majority of those ゲーム王ケノ当選番号 drug related—so that will give you an idea about what is going on with this.
The accidental poisonings, which include drugs, alcohol poisoning and poisoning due to other toxic substances—that total number for 2015 is 47,478, and for 2014 it was 42,032.
And the overwhelming majority of those are drug-related overdoses.
We figured there that it was related to flu.
But we also saw increases in heart disease and stroke mortality.
The heart disease probably affects this more than anything else.
Part of that is due to the aging of the population, but the heart disease rate can be affected by the flu.
Some people are also saying obesity is ppssppゲーム直接ダウンロードアンドロイド用 possible explanation for those heart disease numbers—and maybe it is.
The average age at death has obviously been increasing over time.
For the first time in a decade our death rate increased from the year before; 2015 saw roughly 86,000 more deaths than 2014, click the following article to the new report.
The National Center for Health Statistics NCHSwhich released the numbers this week, found that in 2015 the death rate jumped 1.
The agency calculated that this spike pushed life expectancy down, too.
Standard life expectancy at birth dropped to 78.
Preliminary analysis suggests the increase in deaths may have been driven by drug overdoses and an unusually severe flu season in early 2015, which may have exacerbated not すべてのオンラインゲーム event fatal conditions such as heart disease.
Do they suggest that the increase in deaths in 2015 was just a blip?
We only have numbers for about the first half of 2016, so we do have to be careful about interpreting them.
With that said, we still have the quarter three and quarter four of 2016 to come.
We just entered the flu season now and things could be bad from a flu standpoint, which could drive the numbers up.
These new numbers not only portend a lesser burden on the health care system and families but also suggest that something has changed over the generations—and identifying that change could drive down dementia rates even further.
Kenneth Langa of the University of Michigan analyzed data on more than 10,500 Health and Retirement Study participants aged 65 or older in 2000 and 2012.
The percent of seniors with dementia fell to 8.
One possible factor is education.
The older adults in the 2012 group in the new study had, on average, about one year more education than the 2000 group.
Sanjay Asthana of the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
That may be especially true when people receive effective treatments for diabetes and heart disease, which also became more common with later generations.
A commentary accompanying the JAMA Internal Medicine paper points out that the national data jibe with other evidence: More info this year, the long-running Framingham study found that the risk of dementia サムスン用の無料モバイルゲームサイトのダウンロード old age fell by about 20 percent every decade between 1977 and 2008.
That study came with an asterisk, however, because the Framingham participants come from one small geographic area near Boston and skew white and well-off.
Sudha Seshadri, a professor of neurology at Boston University School of Medicine and senior investigator for the Framingham study.
Now, Quach has suggested a new way to test the Born rule.
The Born rule lets you calculate probabilities by considering interference between pairs of paths, but not between all three paths at once.
Quach パソコンRPG用の無料オフラインゲーム that if you account for interference between all three paths, the probabilities will be different from what the Born rule predicts arxiv.
He suggests testing this with a double-slit experiment that allows for a third path, a wandering zigzag in which the particle goes through the left slit, over to the right slit, then heads towards the screen.
If that third path interferes with the two more straightforward ones, the results should deviate from what the Born rule suggests.
The stakes are high.
Finding violations of the Born rule could be the thin edge of the wedge that pries open the door to a more fundamental understanding of reality.
The double-slit experiment involves shining a light at two close-together slits placed in front of a screen.
But instead, the light spreads out into alternating bands of light and dark.
This interference pattern appears even if you send in one photon at a time, suggesting that rather than moving in a straight line, light behaves as both a wave and a particle at the same time.
However, there is no fundamental reason why the Please click for source rule should hold.
That makes the Born rule a good place to look for cracks in quantum theory.
To unite quantum mechanics, which governs the universe on minute scales, and general relativity, which holds at immense scales, one of the theories must give way.
If the Born rule falls over, it could clear a path to quantum gravity.
What about those Iraqi WMDs?
Neurons in a newly formed memory trace are subsequently more excitable than neighboring brain cells for a transient period of time.
It follows then that a memory formed soon after the first might be encoded in an overlapping population of neurons, which is exactly what Frankland and study co-lead author Sheena Josselyn, found.
Mice who formed a fear memory—one where they were given a foot shock in a particular environment—and then formed a second memory six hours later had formed those two memories in overlapping engrams.
The rodents who formed the same memories 24 hours apart had separate sets of neurons related to each memory.
Mice should normally form separate memories when events happen 24 hours apart, but when the researchers re-excited the neurons in the first memory engram while the second memory was forming, they could artificially link those 栄光の銃 />Decreasing the excitability of the neurons in the first memory during the second event seemed to prevent the second memory from forming.
In these types of experiments, she explains, they are only ever manipulating about 10 percent of the neurons in the amygdala.
If this タイルと一致する無料ゲーム memory cannot form, however, that implies something is changing in the other 90 percent of neurons.
Their findings mean that neurons are competing to be included in the new engram, and in this competition excitability rules.
That 10 percent of neurons are the winners because they inhibit the other 90 percent—it is winner take all.
More than that, Josselyn says, the aim is to understand how memories layer on each other.
To date this study is only the second of its kind.
Josselyn and Frankland studied overlapping memory formation in a brain region called the amygdala, associated with fear experience recollection.
In a Nature article published in June neuroscientist Alcino Silva at the University of California, Los Angeles, and his colleagues found the same principle to hold true in the hippocampus, which stores more factual knowledge.
The interaction between memories is in fact a fundamental part of how we form a coherent view of the world.
That is a massive goal but these experiments have pushed us in the right direction.
You were probably nervous, talking a little too loudly and laughing a little too heartily.
What else does that memory bring to mind?
The lunch you shared later?
The dorm mates you met that night?
Memories beget memories, and as soon as you think of one, you think of more.
Now neuroscientists are starting to figure out why.
When two events happen in short succession, they feel somehow linked to each other.
These clusters of connected cells are known as engrams, continue reading memory traces.
When a mouse receives a light shock to the foot in a particular cage, an engram forms to encode the memory of that event.
Once that memory forms the set of neurons that make up the engram are more likely to fire.
Furthermore, more excitable neurons—that is, brain cells that activate easily—are more likely to be recruited into an engram, so if you increase the excitability of particular neurons, you can preferentially include them in a new engram.
The epicentre was about 115 kilometres northeast of Rome.
The quake follows a series of tremors last week, and many towns in the region had already been evacuated following the magnitude-6.
Freshwater populations, which fell by 81%, are thought to be faring worse than terrestrial ones.
Habitat loss is the main threat, with overexploitation and human-induced climate change also major culprits.
No-one was killed in the quake but 20 were injured and damage to the area round the town of Norcia is extensive.
Prime Minister Matteo Renzi is chairing a meeting of his cabinet to discuss emergency reconstruction.
Other towns and villages to have suffered damage include Castelsantangelo, Preci, Ussita and Arquata.
Central Italy has seen several major quakes in recent years.
Earthquakes which devastated the town of L'Aquila in 2009 and Amatrice in 幼児のための動物ゲームオンライン this year killed about 300 people each.
But they both measured 6.
In a study published in June in Psychological Science, Just and his colleague Robert Mason found that thinking about physics prompts common brain-activation patterns and that these patterns are everyday neural capabilities—used for processing rhythm and sentence structure, for example—that were repurposed for learning abstract science.
The researchers fed the data from the scans into a machine-learning computer program, which visit web page could identify which concept a volunteer was thinking about based on his or her brain activity.
Why was this possible?
Because the neural patterns involved in considering a particular topic—gravity, for instance—were the same in all participants.
These results suggest that general neural structures are repurposed for dealing with high-level science.
The findings may someday help determine which school lessons should be taught together for easiest consumption, Mason says.
He and Just plan on continuing their work with other sciences our ancestors knew little about, including genetics and computer science.
A project funded by the U.
Department of Energy is making notable advances in this quest: scientists at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have developed a material that can effectively pull uranium out of seawater.
The material builds on work by researchers in Japan and consists of braided polyethylene fibers coated with the click amidoxime.
In seawater, amidoxime attracts and binds uranium dioxide to the surface of the braids, which can be on the order of 15 centimeters in diameter and run multiple meters in length depending on where they are deployed.
Later, an acidic treatment recovers the uranium in the form of uranyl ions, a product that requires processing and enrichment before becoming fuel.
The process is still inefficient and expensive, but finding alternatives to uranium ore mining is a necessary step in planning for the future of nuclear energy, says Stephen Kung of the DOE's Office of Nuclear Energy, who was not continue reading in the project.
Terrestrial sources of uranium are expected to last for only another 100 to 200 more years.
At first, the efforts were on a case-by-case basis.
Parents of other bright children began to approach Stanley after hearing about his work with Bates, who thrived after entering university.
By 17, he had earned bachelor's and master's kizi 1000最高のゲーム in computer science and was pursuing a doctorate at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York.
Later, as a professor at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, he would become a pioneer in artificial intelligence.
I could grow up on the social side at my own rate and also on the intellectual side, because the faster pace kept me interested in the content.
In a comparison of children who bypassed a grade with a control group of similarly smart children who didn't, the grade-skippers were 60% more likely to earn doctorates or patents and more than twice as likely to get a PhD in a STEM field.
Acceleration is common in SMPY's elite 1-in-10,000 cohort, whose intellectual diversity and rapid pace of learning make them among the most challenging to educate.
Advancing these students costs little or nothing, and in some cases may save schools money, says Lubinski.
But education researchers generally agree that acceleration benefits the vast majority of gifted children socially and emotionally, as well as academically and professionally.
Skipping grades is not the only option.
SMPY researchers say that even modest interventions—for example, access to challenging material such as college-level Advanced Placement courses—have a demonstrable ゲーム王ケノ当選番号 />Among students with high ability, those who were given a richer density of advanced precollegiate educational opportunities in STEM went on to publish more academic papers, earn more patents and pursue higher-level careers than their equally smart peers who didn't have these opportunities.
Despite SMPY's many insights, researchers still have an incomplete picture of giftedness and achievement.
The Munich Longitudinal Study of Giftedness, which started tracking 26,000 gifted students in the mid-1980s, found that cognitive factors were the most predictive, but that some personal traits—such as motivation, curiosity and ability to cope with stress—had a limited influence on performance.
Environmental factors, such as family, カリブ海オンラインゲームの海賊 and peers, also had an impact.
Some researchers and writers, notably psychologist Anders Ericsson at Florida State University in Tallahassee and author Malcolm Gladwell, have popularized the idea of an ability threshold.
This holds that for individuals beyond a certain IQ barrier 120 is often citedconcentrated practice time is much more important than additional intellectual abilities in acquiring expertise.
But data from SMPY and the Duke talent programme dispute that hypothesis.
A study published this year compared the outcomes of students in the top 1% of childhood intellectual ability with those in the top 0.
Whereas the first group gain advanced degrees at about 25 times the rate of the general population, the more elite students earn PhDs at about 50 times the base rate.
But some of the work is controversial.
In North America and Europe, some child-development experts lament that much of the research on talent development is driven by the urge to predict who will rise to the top, and educators have expressed considerable unease about the concept of identifying and labelling a group of pupils as gifted or talented.
Matthews contends that when children who are near the high and low extremes of early achievement feel assessed in terms of future success, it can damage their motivation to learn and can contribute to what Stanford University psychologist Carol Dweck calls a fixed mindset.
It's far better, Dweck says, toencourage a growth mindset, in which children believe that brains and talent are merely a starting point, and that abilities can be developed through hard work 無料のPC wordゲームのダウンロード continued intellectual risk-taking.
Next year, Benbow and Lubinski plan to launch a mid-life survey of the profoundly gifted cohort the 1 in 10,000with an emphasis on career achievements and life satisfaction, and to re-survey their 1992 sample of graduate students at leading US universities.
The forthcoming studies may further erode the enduring misperception that gifted children are bright enough to succeed on their own, without much help.
Many are participants in the ブリッジポートウェストバージニア州カジノ Programs for Talented Youth, summer enrichment courses in which gifted students spend three weeks gorging themselves on a year's worth of mathematics, science or literature.
Others are participants in Vanderbilt's sports camps.
In 1976, Stanley started to test his second cohort a sample of 563 13-year-olds who scored in the top 0.
Tests for spatial ability might include matching objects that are seen from different perspectives, determining which cross-section will result when an object is cut in certain ways, or estimating water levels on tilted bottles of various shapes.
Stanley was curious about whether spatial ability might better predict educational and occupational outcomes than could measures of quantitative and verbal reasoning on their own.
A 2013 analysis found a correlation between the number of patents and peer-refereed publications that people had produced and their earlier scores on SATs and spatial-ability tests.
The SAT tests jointly accounted for about 11% of the variance; spatial ability accounted for an additional 7.
The findings, which dovetail with those of other recent studies, suggest that spatial ability plays a major part in creativity and technical innovation.
In the Middle East and east Asia, high-performing STEM students have received significant attention over the past decade.
South Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore screen children for giftedness and steer high performers into innovative programmes.
In 2010, China launched a ten-year National Talent Development Plan to support and guide top students into science, technology and other high-demand fields.
In Europe, support for research and educational programmes for gifted children has ebbed, as the focus has moved more towards inclusion.
England decided in 2010 to scrap the National Academy for Gifted and Talented Youth, and redirected funds towards an effort to get more poor students into leading universities.
Benbow was a graduate student at Johns Hopkins when she met Stanley in a class he taught in 1976.
Benbow and Lubinski, who have co-directed the study since Stanley's retirement, brought it to Vanderbilt in 1998.
Built in 1915, it houses a small collection of antique calculators—the tools of quantitative psychology in the early 1950s, when Stanley began his academic work in psychometrics and statistics.
His interest in developing scientific talent had been piqued by one of the most famous longitudinal studies in psychology, Lewis Terman's Genetic Studies of Genius.
Beginning in 1921, Terman selected teenage subjects on the basis of high IQ scores, then tracked and encouraged their careers.
But to Terman's chagrin, his cohort produced only a few esteemed scientists.
Among those rejected because their IQ of 129 was too low to make the cut was William Shockley, the Nobel-prizewinning co-inventor of the transistor.
Physicist Luis Alvarez, another Nobel winner, was also rejected.
So Stanley decided to try the Scholastic Aptitude Test now simply the SAT.
Although the test is intended for older students, Stanley hypothesized that it would be well suited to measuring the analytical reasoning abilities of elite younger students.
It was the first standardized academic 'talent search'.
Later, researchers included the verbal portion and other assessments.
But after the first follow-up survey, five years later, Benbow proposed extending the study to track subjects through their lives, adding cohorts and including assessments of interests, preferences, and occupational and other life accomplishments.
The study's first four cohorts range from the top 3% to the top 0.
The SMPY team added a fifth cohort of the leading mathematics and science think, オンラインダイヤモンドゲーム無料ダウンロード apologise students in 1992 to test the generalizability of the talent-search model for identifying scientific potential.
The Baltimore student was so far ahead of his classmates in mathematics that his parents had arranged for him to take a computer-science course at Johns Hopkins University, where Stanley taught.
宝石ゲームアプリ that wasn't enough.
Having leapfrogged ahead of the adults in the class, the child kept himself busy by teaching the FORTRAN programming language to graduate students.
Unsure of what to do with Bates, his computer instructor introduced him to Stanley, a researcher well known for his work スロットカートレーナー代理レーシング psychometrics—the study of cognitive performance.
To discover more about the young prodigy's talent, Stanley gave Bates a battery of tests that included the SAT college-admissions exam, normally taken by university-bound 16- to 18-year-olds in the United States.
Bates's score was well above the threshold for admission to Johns Hopkins, and prompted Stanley to search for a local high school that would let the child take advanced mathematics and science classes.
When that plan failed, Stanley convinced a dean at Johns Hopkins to let Johns Hopkins, then 13, enrol as an undergraduate.
As the longest-running current longitudinal survey of intellectually talented children, SMPY has for 45 years tracked the careers and accomplishments of some 5,000 individuals, many of whom have gone on to become high-achieving scientists.
The study's ever-growing data set ゲーム王ケノ当選番号 generated more than 400 papers and several books, and provided key insights into how to spot and develop talent in science, technology, engineering, mathematics STEM and beyond.
But Stanley wasn't interested in just studying bright children; he wanted to nurture their intellect and enhance the odds that they would change the world.
Many of the innovators who are advancing science, technology and culture are those whose unique cognitive abilities were identified and supported in their early years through enrichment programmes such as Johns Hopkins University's Center for Talented Youth which Stanley began in the 1980s as an adjunct to SMPY.
At the start, both the study and the centre were open to young adolescents who scored in the top 1% on university entrance exams.
Pioneering mathematicians Terence Tao and Lenhard Ng were one-percenters, as were Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, Google co-founder Sergey Brin and musician Stefani Germanotta Lady Gagawho all passed through the Hopkins centre.
Wai combined data from 11 prospective and retrospective longitudinal studies, including SMPY, to demonstrate the correlation between early cognitive ability and adult achievement.
SMPY, by contrast, suggests that early cognitive ability has more effect on achievement than either deliberate practice or environmental factors such as socio-economic status.
The research emphasizes the importance of nurturing precocious children, at a time when the prevailing focus in the United States and other countries is on improving the performance of struggling students.
At the same time, the work to identify and support academically talented students has raised troubling questions about the risks of labelling children, and the shortfalls of talent searches and standardized tests as a means of identifying high-potential students, especially in poor and rural districts.
Either way, it can really undermine a child's motivation to learn.
The Last One Surprised Me!
関係者の証言では、今回の事件で明らかになった官製談合の構図は、木村知事が初当選した00年秋ごろ、知事自身と井山容疑者、県の元最高幹部の3人が相談して作ったとされる。.... 予約⇒お名前、所属、会員の有無、Eメール、電話番号を記載の上、必ず2日前までにEメールでお申込み下さい。.... 樂ニ於ルハ野人ナリト謂レタノヲ見レバ、周初ノ開ケノ程モ思ヒ見ルベキｺﾄデゴザル、今一騷委シク考證シテ申サウナラバ、丈王ノ.
Absolutely with you it agree. I like your idea. I suggest to take out for the general discussion.
It is well told.
I advise to you to look a site on which there is a lot of information on this question.
Infinitely to discuss it is impossible
It still that?
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you commit an error. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
Yes, really. I join told all above. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.
I think, that you are mistaken. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM.
Bravo, seems brilliant idea to me is
I can recommend to come on a site, with a large quantity of articles on a theme interesting you.
It is remarkable, rather valuable idea
In my opinion you are not right. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.